top of page

The CORPORATION COVID Policies

  • Writer: Mark Stansell
    Mark Stansell
  • Aug 24, 2021
  • 4 min read

Updated: Aug 26, 2021


Dear Boss Man,


This is not a letter of resignation.


Pursuant to our previous conversations, I remind you that wearing a facemask for hours, even minutes, creates a significant hazard to the both the physiological and psychological health of humans, and doing so severely impacts the ability of all instructors and staff to perform their jobs. I do not consent to wearing a mask anywhere in the building. Furthermore, should the CORPORATION senior management decide to institute regular COVID-19 testing, or require employees to be vaccinated, I do not consent to those procedures either. All of these are medical, or medically related, procedures which require consent of the individual. The only medically related procedure I consent to as a condition of employment is random drug and alcohol testing.


Your emails address the perceived concerns of clients; however, they fail to address the legitimate health concerns, which are based on facts, of the employees concerning masking, COVID testing, and vaccinations.


The correct response, the moral response, the courageous response to clients’ concerns about COVID-19, which has an aggregate survival rate of 99.9%, is simply to remain neutral. The client’s health is their business. If they want to partake in the medical experimentation of the COVID vaccine, and wear a face mask, that is their business. Likewise, the individual employee’s health is their own concern. To receive the vaccine or not, to wear a mask or not, is their own concern. The CORPORATION may lose some clients over that policy, but I am extremely confident the CORPORATION would gain so many more by being a leader, as opposed to a follower, on this issue.


By way of review…

  • In March 2020, I forwarded you and other senior management a copy of the letter I sent to the mayor, wherein I outlined what was then the nascent fraud of the entire COVID pandemic, the financial ramifications of the lockdowns, and, more importantly, the constitutional overreach concerning the reactions to the supposed emergency.

  • In June 2020, I sent you an email with suggestions to roll back some of the effects from acquiescing to the governor’s continued overreach of both the federal and state constitutions. Significantly, in that email I provided numerous references on the hazards of wearing a facemask, which include:

“… wearing a mask raises the risk of hypoxia, which can directly affect a client's ability to learn, as well as the instructor’s ability to teach. Furthermore, hypoxia has a direct negative effect on the immune system, which raises the risk of infection.”

I have every confidence that you have passed all this information to the CORPORATION senior management.


Since the CORPORATION senior management is intent on again implementing these mandates, I provide yet another document, “Federal Law in Places of Public Accommodation,” which outlines the legal aspects of unconstitutionality and illegality of masking, testing, and vaccine mandates. While written to law enforcement and governors, principally concerning masking, the entire discussion is germane to employers and places of business as well.


Neither I, any instructor, staff member, nor any client, are “a direct threat to the health and safety of others.” Without “an individualized assessment, based on reasonable judgment that relies on current medical knowledge or on the best available objective evidence…” to ascertain that we are, neither the CORPORATION nor the state is allowed to treat us as such. (28 CFR § 36.208 - Direct threat.) I point out, again, as I did in my email of last week, the CDC has all but admitted that PCR tests are next to worthless when it comes to differentiating 2019-nCoV from diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.


I cannot, nor will not, be coerced into wearing a mask, submit to COVID testing, or taking a vaccine, all of which are either detrimental to my health or inaccurate. Management would be served well to seriously consider not only the points outlined in Enclosure 1, but also 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights, 42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion, and 42 U.S. Code § 3617 - Interference, coercion, or intimidation.


To acquiesce to the tyrant or dictator, to kneel before the mob, to cower before the bully only ever encourages and enables the tyrant, dictator, mob, or bully to continue their abusive behavior. It is beyond disconcerting that the CORPORATION senior management is unable to realize, prima facia, let alone after all the documented information I have provided, that by instituting these policies, not only are they in volition of the U.S. Constitution and numerous sections of federal law, more importantly, they are complicit in, and enabling, medical apartheid and the tyranny that is rapidly consuming the entire planet.


Regards,

A Medical Tyranny Adverse Employee

 

What do you think happened to the Medical Tyranny Adverse Employee? 🪓


Namaste and keep fighting the tyranny folks!

Mark

August 24, 2021

Comentarios

Obtuvo 0 de 5 estrellas.
Aún no hay calificaciones

Agrega una calificación

Drop Me a Line, Let Me Know What You Think

Thanks for submitting!

© 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 by Mark J Stansell. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page